CO129-370 - Governor Sir Lugard & Public Offices - 1910 [12] — Page 598

4) practically jan 1350 use to the

Defence Fund (13. the Military hands share ser avdelar & 1884): That tiefere the property is vitally, the purhaps not strictly Colonial Mistry hand within the meaning the

circular; & that on sale of the land thing

must weise oudit to the

commuted Brown Ken-

othe the Defence hand with be diminished to that extent, which according to the (ercending

In 1894 is not the permitad.

The Colony's

warned

In

Cant

is (a) that the ₤1st Lung

1857 for so long

remained to property

the peoper by

not a permanent

but temporing angmentation of the sefence Fund My that the case is not strelly in thei

ALL

the 4 commers the circulars. They perpaced & compromise on the basis o abowing 1.0. cusit on disposal of the

property of

It is perhaps

m.

nik

pris

I them now

arguable point whether the

Spring Gardens property is or is not mihtan

land

A

11694

defined by the circn'ar = "but persmety Loh? hold strongly that if anything it is

land light from Imperial funds.

Ao

*00/2 *MAY 20/15 0009 "88-370′03 9M (OBST)

21-2011 (500 provided in the 1890 circular. you will so that

Sie st. Berkeley (well 9331/09) hold their news

Imperit Lease hold land..

& desents th

It is, I submit, not colomil military land the unr & which has hungoanted & the Col. Gort & the war dept.

Grach

o the Sot, mcennot be construed

The wairing & the unt was an act

on the Band

Ko

giving perpetual.

& this bingung ter

property within the terms of a sabesment criculas,

Further the W.O. are detared from this plea by

them on

admission in 171th log where thy plead

park 102 the 1894 ascular egemit the Colony's

claur Pain 10 says "this not hespond to

Y in

hopen any

Be

detoured

transmeton's already closed

consequence that para the Colony as deterred from

dis

daimming widit to the want, the the hed from clasining that any part of the question can come under the circular. Also the Colony does not phad the airanlar in support & its claim

: had sezo

that if the case is to be brated as

coming under the

dindlay Smith property ahargement 13 under the

circular as urand the crusiting frent, then the